by me, Kerry Burgess, 11/11/2025 03:47 AM
Laboring under the presumption this is a problem that I can solve, this note is for only the purpose of illustrating the problem domain
Because I have not cracked it
Got a match during my original-work research
However, there is a discrepancy of about 6 minutes
And that in no way is a solution. Might as well be 6 days or 6 years or anything. Can think of no meaningful, artistic merit to assign to that discrepancy of about 6 minutes
How I got to this example
While back, and not sure when it became first available, noticed that Microsoft Windows allows seconds of minutes in the date-time bar
When I discovered it, I enabled it at that moment and it has been active ever since on my desktop-computer
So, for this challenge, I began with that detail
I looked through my archive of images I have captured for illustrations of my blog-posts here until I found that first image with hours-minutes-seconds in the screenshot image I captured for illustration
The first image I discovered is dated 02/06/2024 at 8:41:51 PM.
The image illustrates my work on the topic of the calendar-day 11/14/2004.
Laboring under the presumption it is a code for me to crack, I determined that 439 days 19 hours 56 minutes 11 seconds forward from 02/06/2024 8:41:51 is a point in time, in my archive files, I found compelling
Except for the discrepancy of 6 minutes, based on timestamps available to me.
That is how close I narrowed down to a match compelling to me personally.
What would it prove?
And then some other stuff I wanted to note because of previous blog-posts I have made after starting this track. Because this is the sort of thing that makes this very, very real for me personally.
- by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me: 04:37 AM Pacific-timezone USA Tuesday 11/11/2025
