I am Kerry Burgess. This is what I think.
If this is the first blog-post by me you're reading then you are galactically uninformed.
This Is What I Think.
Tuesday, April 22, 2025
Today is 04/22/2025, Post #4
see also:
https://hvom.blogspot.com/2025/04/today-is-04222025-post-3.html
IMDb
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)
Quotes
[first lines]
John Connor: [voiceover] The future has not been written. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves. I wish I could believe that. My name is John Connor, they tried to murder me before I was born, when I was 13 they tried again. Machines from the future. Terminators. All my life my mother told me the storm was coming, Judgment Day, the beginning of the war between man and machines. Three billion lives would vanish in an instant, and I would lead what was left of the human race to ultimate victory. It hasn't happened, no bombs fell, computers didn't take control, we stopped Judgment Day. I should feel safe, but I don't, so I live off the grid - no phone, no address, no one and nothing can find me. I've erased all connections to the past, but as hard as I try I can't erase my dreams, my nightmares.
IMDb
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)
Quotes
John Connor: Do you even remember me? Sarah Connor? Blowing up Cyberdyne? Hasta la vista, baby? Ring any bells?
Terminator: That was a different T-101.
John Connor: What, do you guys come off an assembly line or something?
Terminator: Exactly.
IMDb
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (2003)
Quotes
Kate Brewster: John, what is he saying?
John Connor: Judgment Day. The end of the world. It's today, three hours from now.
Terminator: Two hours and fifty-three minutes.
excerpts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper
Grace Hopper
From Wikipedia
Grace Brewster Hopper (née Murray; December 9, 1906 – January 1, 1992) was an American computer scientist, mathematician, and United States Navy rear admiral. She was a pioneer of computer programming.
"The most important thing I've accomplished, other than building the compiler", she said, "is training young people. They come to me, you know, and say, 'Do you think we can do this?' I say, 'Try it.' And I back 'em up. They need that. I keep track of them as they get older and I stir 'em up at intervals so they don't forget to take chances."
Grace Hopper
From Wikipedia
Later in life, she was known for keeping a clock that ran backward, she explained, "Humans are allergic to change. They love to say, 'We've always done it this way.' I try to fight that. That's why I have a clock on my wall that runs counterclockwise."
Grace Hopper
From Wikipedia
Hopper became known for her nanoseconds visual aid. People (such as generals and admirals) used to ask her why satellite communication took so long. She started handing out pieces of wire that were just under one foot long—11.8 inches (30 cm)—the distance that light travels in one nanosecond. She gave these pieces of wire the metonym "nanoseconds". She was careful to tell her audience that the length of her nanoseconds was actually the maximum distance the signals would travel in a vacuum in a nanosecond, and that signals would travel more slowly through the actual wires that were her teaching aids. Later she used the same pieces of wire to illustrate why computers had to be small to be fast. At many of her talks and visits, she handed out "nanoseconds" to everyone in the audience, contrasting them with a coil of wire 984 feet (300 meters) long, representing a microsecond. Later, while giving these lectures while working for DEC, she passed out packets of pepper, calling the individual grains of ground pepper picoseconds.
by me, Kerry Burgess, posted by me May 15 2019 UTC
I stated that 'c' stood for 'constant', a constant speed *such as* the speed of light, not necessarily the SOL
by me, Kerry Burgess, 11/21/2023
Photons can - inconstantly - travel at 'c' because they have no mass
E=mc^2
1917-12-20_1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bohm
continuing, Event Date variable 11/28/2024
From 12/20/1917 ( ) To 11/28/2024 ( ) is 39060 days
39060 = 19530 + 19530
From 11/2/1965 ( my known birth date in Antlers, Oklahoma, USA, as Kerry Wayne Burgess ) To 4/23/2019 ( ) is 19530 days
From 10/26/2014 ( premiere USA film "Interstellar" ) To 4/23/2019 ( ) is 1640 days
From 11/2/1965 ( my known birth date in Antlers, Oklahoma, USA, as Kerry Wayne Burgess ) To 4/30/1970 ( premiere USA TV series episode "Daniel Boone"::"How to Become a Goddess" ) is 1640 days
2019-04-23_1
https://x.com/NASA/status/1120833110390857729
dark-matter_s1e7-2024_00h-08m-17s
dark-matter_s1e7-2024_00h-09m-00s
dark-matter_s1e7-2024_00h-17m-16s
interstellar_02h42m59s
interstellar_02h43m52s
interstellar-2014_01h-34m-54s
interstellar-2014_00h-20m-57s
interstellar-2014_00h-21m-07s
2019-04-23_2
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dust
2019-04-23_3
From: Kerry Burgess
To: Kerry Burgess
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 6:25:22 PM
Subject: Re: Star Trek: TNG: First Contact, Nov. 22, 1996
There was that dream I had the other night, where I was inside a missile. I remembered today the similarity with this movie, in that Cochrane converted an ICBM into his warp ship. But why would someone create a connection between me and Cochrane? I didn't create warp drive in the past only to have someone block my memory of that, did I? It's funny, when I read something the other day about Data arguing with Einstein, it reminded me of something I was writing in my journal back in the early '90s. I was wondering why it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of light. A couple years ago I was writing about it again. The idea presented itself to me about why it was impossible, something about atoms not being able to work because electrons could not transfer energy faster than the speed of light. I wondered if it was possible to create some kind of process to transfer energy to those atoms, not unlike a cell's mitochondria works. Today I have been wondering if anything I remember about the past is real. Do I have a different past? Am I really who I think I am? The stuff I imagine happening to me sometimes, did that stuff really happen?
by me, Kerry Burgess, posted by me: July 05, 2017 3:02 am
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse
Multiverse
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The multiverse (or meta-universe) is the hypothetical set of possible universes, including the universe in which we live. Together, these universes comprise everything that exists: the entirety of space, time, matter, energy, and the physical laws and constants that describe them.
The various universes within the multiverse are called "parallel universes", "other universes", or "alternative universes".
Origin of the concept
In Dublin in 1952, Erwin Schrödinger gave a lecture in which he jocularly warned his audience that what he was about to say might "seem lunatic". He said that, when his Nobel equations seemed to describe several different histories, these were "not alternatives, but all really happen simultaneously". This is the earliest known reference to the multiverse outside of fiction.
***
***
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_universe_(fiction)
Parallel universe (fiction)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Science fiction
While technically incorrect, and looked down upon by hard science-fiction fans and authors, the idea of another "dimension" has become synonymous with the term "parallel universe". The usage is particularly common in movies, television and comic books and much less so in modern prose science fiction. The idea of a parallel world was first introduced in comic books with the publication of The Flash #123, "Flash of Two Worlds".[citation needed]
In written science fiction, "new dimensions" more commonly – and more accurately – refer to additional coordinate axes, beyond the three spatial axes with which we are familiar. By proposing travel along these extra axes, which are not normally perceptible, the traveler can reach worlds that are otherwise unreachable and invisible.
Television series involving parallel universes
Charlie Jade, in which the titular character is accidentally thrown into our universe and is looking for a way back to his own.
by me, Kerry Burgess, posted by me: July 25, 2020
Somewhere in my posts, I wrote about my thoughts on this topic, popular in science-fiction
My dissertation being that the Many Worlds Theory is just a big crock of shit
The basis of that theory, I've speculated, is ignoring that electrons *have* predictability
My guess is that someone reverse-engineered that notion that the states of electrons can NEVER be determined
Therefore, everything is uncertain
And since everything is uncertain then everything is possible
I think that the invention of Many Worlds Theory based on that viewpoint is dim-witted
There is only ONE reason that the states of electrons cannot be determined: the primitive technology of the human-race
My assertion is that anything that tries to measure the state of electrons would have to shoot more electrons at the target electron, thus changing it
So, out there somewhere in the vast Universe, with it bazillions of possibilities for life vastly more intelligent than human will be ever, there may be technology that can measure accurately and unobtrusively the state of electrons.
Predictable eliminates uncertainty.
Posted by me, Kerry Burgess, February 27, 2017
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/hugh-everett-biography/
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
The Many Worlds of Hugh Everett
After his now celebrated theory of multiple universes met scorn, Hugh Everett abandoned the world of academic physics. He turned to top secret military research and led a tragic private life
By Peter Byrne on October 21, 2008
Everett’s scientific journey began one night in 1954, he recounted two decades later, “after a slosh or two of sherry.” He and his Princeton classmate Charles Misner and a visitor named Aage Petersen (then an assistant to Niels Bohr) were thinking up “ridiculous things about the implications of quantum mechanics.” During this session Everett had the basic idea behind the many-worlds theory, and in the weeks that followed he began developing it into a dissertation.
The core of the idea was to interpret what the equations of quantum mechanics represent in the real world by having the mathematics of the theory itself show the way instead of by appending interpretational hypotheses to the math. In this way, the young man challenged the physics establishment of the day to reconsider its foundational notion of what constitutes physical reality.
In pursuing this endeavor, Everett boldly tackled the notorious measurement problem in quantum mechanics, which had bedeviled physicists since the 1920s. In a nutshell, the problem arises from a contradiction between how elementary particles (such as electrons and photons) interact at the microscopic, quantum level of reality and what happens when the particles are measured from the macroscopic, classical level. In the quantum world, an elementary particle, or a collection of such particles, can exist in a superposition of two or more possible states of being. An electron, for example, can be in a superposition of different locations, velocities and orientations of its spin. Yet anytime scientists measure one of these properties with precision, they see a definite result—just one of the elements of the superposition, not a combination of them. Nor do we ever see macroscopic objects in superpositions. The measurement problem boils down to this question: How and why does the unique world of our experience emerge from the multiplicities of alternatives available in the superposed quantum world?
Physicists use mathematical entities called wave functions to represent quantum states. A wave function can be thought of as a list of all the possible configurations of a superposed quantum system, along with numbers that give the probability of each configuration’s being the one, seemingly selected at random, that we will detect if we measure the system. The wave function treats each element of the superposition as equally real, if not necessarily equally probable from our point of view.
by me, Kerry Burgess, posted online by me: 09/14/2020
From my research, most of that Multiple Universe nonsense, common in popular science-fiction, started with some comments by some guy in Physics, at Princeton University, wasn't it?
My guess is that spawned out of the fact that the precise location of electrons can never be determined. Because, with modern human technology, you would have to shoot more electrons at that electron to track it and thus, you just changed it.
So, the fact is: electrons ALWAYS have a precise location. Is just that humans have no way of knowing those precise details
So some guy at Princeton - drunk, perhaps - extrapolated the notion into a wacky, convoluted idea that multiple-universes exist
Since electrons can't be tracked then ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE, according to that wacky physics graduate. But the reality is: Anything is not possible, when extrapolating with the unknown-electrons idea
by me, Kerry Burgess, 12/04/2023 06:30 AM
Thinking about that reminds me again of my guess about how "parallel universes" became a popular topic in sc-fi
I've written before about my completly uninformed thoughts on the topic
My * guess * being that it's because the position of the electron is unknowable with the state of human science
That makes is a variable
And since a scientist never knows "how much" then any math calculations in any sort of quantum physics is always going to be a guess
My guess is that math was used that featured varibles about the states of electrons and they got some wacky results which they assumed meant there are multiple universes
Would that still happen if the state of the electron became non-variable?
I'm thinking about this again for several reasons
One reason, people seem to be going to a lot of trouble to get my attention
And it's not because so I will contact them directly
Commercialism is involved but is not, I am thinking, the ultimate objective, for my part, of those behind the operations I am detecting.
Another reason is this overall situation.
Certainly, planning and coordination is obvious.
How did I get here, where am I going
There is a reason to all this and I labor under the assumption that I am supposed to find *something*
Something grand.
Something that makes it all worth it.
So, systemized in my thinking because, notably, of "Stargate" I am drawing lines on boards
I don't know who reads my posts but I am guessing you are like me in my perception of time.
None of this especially insightful. Nothing especially enlightened. Perhaps not even all that intelligent. Is mostly just elemental
If you're like me, then you see 'time' as always flowing forward
We have clocks that tell us that fact
1906-12-25_1
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1986/ruska/facts/
From 12/25/1906 ( ) To 2/15/2025 ( ) is 43152 days
43152 = 21576 + 21576
From 11/2/1965 ( my known birth date in Antlers, Oklahoma, USA, as Kerry Wayne Burgess ) To 11/28/2024 ( ) is 21576 days
2025-02-15_1
https://hvom.blogspot.com/2025/02/today-is-02152025-post-2.html
impostor_01h21m19s
impostor_00h18m35s
- by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me: 3:02 PM Pacific-timezone USA Tuesday 04/22/2025