This Is What I Think.

Monday, June 17, 2024

Today is 06/17/2024, Post #2





by me, Kerry Burgess, 06/17/2024 10:54 PM

Updates - by me - my previous post about Event Date variable 06/16/2017, my original-work code-pattern

Remains to be seen yet if I finish and publish here my draft-in-progress blog-posts concerning Planet of the Apes, Rise- and Dawn-









excepts - first retrieved by me, Kerry Burgess, 06/17/2024 10:00 PM

https://www.yahoo.com/news/time-may-actually-one-big-180200313.html

Yahoo! News

Time May Actually Be One Big Illusion, Says a New Study

Caroline Delbert

Mon, June 17, 2024 at 11:02 AM PDT

The theory is called Page and Wootters mechanism, and Coppo has studied it for years. It’s a quantum mechanics idea that dates back to 1983.









excerpts - see also:

https://hvom.blogspot.com/2024/06/today-is-06162024-post-1.html

by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me: 8:31 AM

Number 878: The Farthest Man From Home

I am Kerry Burgess. This is what I think.

Sunday, June 16, 2024

Today is 06/16/2024, Post #1

by me, Kerry Burgess, posted by me: June 15, 2017 8:04 pm

Kerry Burgess updated his status.

Idiocracy (2006)

Quotes

Female Reporter: It started off boring and slow with Not Sure trying to bullshit everyone with a bunch of smart talk: 'Blah blah blah. You gotta believe me!' That part of the trial sucked! But then the Chief J. just went off. He said, 'Man, whatever! The guy's guilty as shit! We all know that.' And he sentenced his ass to one night of rehabilitation.



[excerpts ends - by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me: 8:31 AM June 16, 2024]










2017-06-16_3

https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2885









https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2885

APS

PHYSICAL REVIEW

Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables

Don N. Page and William K. Wootters

Phys. Rev. D 27, 2885 – Published 15 June 1983

ABSTRACT

Because the time parameter in the Schrödinger equation is not observable, energy apparently obeys a superselection rule in the same sense that charge does. That is, observables must all commute with the Hamiltonian and hence be stationary. This means that it is consistent with all observations to assume that any closed system such as the Universe is in a stationary state. We show how the observed dynamic evolution of a system can be described entirely in terms of stationary observables as a dependence upon internal clock readings.

Received 17 June 1982









From 6/15/1983 ( ) To 6/16/2017 ( ) is 12420 days

12420 = 6210 + 6210

From 11/2/1965 ( my known birth date in Antlers, Oklahoma, USA, as Kerry Wayne Burgess ) To 11/3/1982 ( as Kerry Burgess my official US Navy documents includes: Enlisted Classification Record - ASVAB - Date Administered ) is 6210 days









by me, Kerry Burgess, posted by me: June 16, 2017 10:35 am

The Moon and The Desert

07 March 1973

00:30:37

Dr. Rudy Wells: Everything I told Steve Austin was designed to reassure him that in all respects, he'd be a normal man again. What I didn't tell him, because I didn't feel he was ready for it, was the extent to which he would be abnormal.









https://www.yahoo.com/news/time-may-actually-one-big-180200313.html

Yahoo! News

Time May Actually Be One Big Illusion, Says a New Study

Caroline Delbert

Mon, June 17, 2024 at 11:02 AM PDT

Time May Actually Be One Big Illusion

Could the observable universe be exclusively composed of layered, mutually entangled systems?

The passage of time puzzles quantum physicists, who seek to fit it into a cohesive model.

One wild theory posits that time visibly passes because we’re entangled with... well... everything.

Time has puzzled scientists for many decades. Does it meaningfully exist apart from our experience of it as everything moves toward the disintegration of entropy along its irrefutable arrow? You can’t put the “spilled milk” of the weirdness of time back in the jug.

In new research published in the American Physical Society's peer-reviewed journal Physical Review A, scientists from Italy (led by Alessandro Coppo) try to translate one theory of time into real life—or, at least, closer to it. The theory is called Page and Wootters mechanism, and Coppo has studied it for years. It’s a quantum mechanics idea that dates back to 1983.

While general relativity (in the classical physics model) lets time be a variable—like the perception-dependent difference between time on Earth and time in space in stories like Interstellar—quantum physics requires it to be nailed down. That means instead of a dependent variable (something defined by an external property, like local gravity or an object’s distance from Earth), time must be independent, and there must be some way to measure it as such.

This may seem counterintuitive. After all, quantum mechanics is considered the newer version of things—the one that destabilizes the foundation of physics in order to be reconciled with the classical model. But time has a unique role in quantum systems. After all, everything in a particular time, defined in some objective way, is knitted together through quantum interactions until it forms a capture of the entire universe (if you zoom out enough).

In their paper, Coppo and his coauthors turn the Page and Wootters approach into a real concept for a clock. Within quantum physics, a clock isn’t much like the one you wear on your wrist or hang in your office—it’s anything that has a predictable and uniform behavior that can be used as a measurement. (For example, this 2021 Quanta article lists increasingly stinky garbage as a kind of clock!)

New Scientist explains that Page and Wootters wondered if our world is so quantumly entangled within itself that any visible passing of time is a symptom of entanglement. They also suggested that we ourselves are implicated in that entanglement just by seeing the passage of time—because someone outside of the entangled system would see it standing still. The “clock,” therefore, is the item within the entangled system that shows time passing.

It’s easy to see why this theory has stayed mostly abstract for over 40 years. To turn it into something with measurements based in real life observation, scientists took iconic physics equations and restricted them to conditions that match the Page and Wootters scenario. They considered two systems that are entangled but do not interact, where one system is a harmonic oscillator—like a quartz timing in a watch, or a pendulum.

Their solution may prove to be consistent within classical and quantum mechanics, because when enough particles are placed into each quantum system—when it reaches the threshold called “macroscopic,” based on mass—the systems align with classical physics as well.

That‘s a big deal - if our entire, very macroscopic world fits into this definition of time based on entanglement, it means everything around us is entangled. Things would need to be entangled almost by definition in order to be part of our observable world. And it would mean that anything we see where time passes (no matter how far away it is) is linked with us in a vital way.










_DSC00858 smdm
_DSC00859 smdm
_DSC00862 smdm
_DSC00867 smdm









Pilot Movie 1: The Six Million Dollar Man

07 March 1973

00:01:32

General: If Austin isn't here in two minutes, I'm gonna pull the plug. Where does he come off keeping us all waiting?

General's aide: General.

General: What's going on here? Where does he think he is?

00:02:24

Colonel Steve Austin: General.

General: Mr. Austin.

Colonel Steve Austin: Yes, sir?

General: Have you any idea what time it is?

Colonel Steve Austin: [ squints up at the Sun ] About five to seven?

Dr. Rudy Wells: Excuse me, General. Hey, Steve. You got a positive genius for antagonizing the wrong people.

Colonel Steve Austin: I know. It's the story of my life.










STS-49_crew .jpg, from internet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STS-49










s49-91-029 .jpg, from internet



- by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me: 11:10 PM Pacific-time USA Monday 06/17/2024