This Is What I Think.

Saturday, September 03, 2016

That's a FACT, Jack!




http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s8/transcripts/818.shtml

GateWorld


STARGATE SG-1

THREADS

EPISODE NUMBER - 818

DVD DISC - Season 8, Disc 5

ORIGINAL U.S. AIR DATE - 03.11.05


S.G.C. BRIEFING ROOM. Sam comes up the stairs from the Control Room. She looks into Jack's office and sees him talking with a woman in her thirties. Sam waits patiently in the Briefing Room until Jack and the woman have finished their conversation and he has shown her out of the door into the corridor. He closes the door and, as he turns to go back to his desk, he sees Sam outside and beckons her in. She walks into the office.

CARTER: Sorry, sir. I saw you were with someone -- I didn't want to interrupt.

O'NEILL: What's up?

CARTER: Who was that?

O'NEILL: Um, Kerry Johnson, CIA.

CARTER: I've heard the name. Oh, yeah, she was heading up the investigation into, uh, Goa'uld still at large after the incident with The Trust.

O'NEILL: Yeah.












http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/stargate/images/7/7f/Kerry_Johnson.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20090201182248










http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s8/transcripts/818.shtml

GateWorld


STARGATE SG-1

THREADS

EPISODE NUMBER - 818

DVD DISC - Season 8, Disc 5

ORIGINAL U.S. AIR DATE - 03.11.05


JOHNSON: (She comes into the office and closes the door.)

O'NEILL (suspiciously): Closing the door.

JOHNSON: Yeah. Deeply symbolic.

O'NEILL: Really?

(Kerry smiles at him awkwardly.)

JOHNSON: I really like you. We're good together.

(Jack stands up.)

O'NEILL: Yes. We are. But?

JOHNSON: You have issues. It's OK -- we all do. There's just one big one in particular that I don't think I can love with. (Jack raises his eyebrows. Kerry flinches and corrects herself.) Live with. I need to get out before I get more involved. We can still work together, can't we? I'd hate to have to ask for reassignment. This is really important to me. We agreed this would never affect the job.

O'NEILL: We did.

JOHNSON: Good. (She smiles and walks towards the door, then turns and puts her hands on her hips.) You know, there's just one thing I don't understand.

O'NEILL: Just one?





http://www.gateworld.net/sg1/s8/transcripts/818.shtml

GateWorld


STARGATE SG-1

THREADS

EPISODE NUMBER - 818

DVD DISC - Season 8, Disc 5

ORIGINAL U.S. AIR DATE - 03.11.05


JOHNSON: Is the Air Force the only thing keeping you two apart? Rules and regulations? Cos if it is, you're making a very big mistake.

O'NEILL: And you know what I should do?

JOHNSON: Retire.

O'NEILL: Again.

JOHNSON: Don't get me wrong -- you are considered invaluable to the programme by the Pentagon, but the President has appointed a civilian to run the S.G.C. before. (Jack nods.) Just a thought.










http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/royals/etc/cron.html

PBS

the royals and the press


June 21, 1969 A film is made and aired by the BBC called "Royal Family." Its aim is to promote the Royals and cameras are allowed in to film their daily life. The program is almost two hours long and 68% of Britain's population watches it.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1346984/The-home-movie-doesnt-want-Why-Queen-STILL-keeping-wraps-fly-wall-film-changed-view-Royals.html

Mail Online

The home movie one doesn't want you to see: Why is the Queen STILL keeping under wraps the fly on the wall film that changed our view of the Royals

By Michael Thornton

Last updated at 1:12 AM on 14th January 2011

You’re killing the monarchy, you know, with this film you’re making,’ the legendary anthropologist and wildlife expert David Attenborough wrote furiously in 1969 to the producer-director of the controversial and ground-breaking BBC television documentary, Royal Family.

‘The whole institution depends on ­mystique and the tribal chief in his hut,’ continued Attenborough, then a BBC controller.

‘If any member of the tribe ever sees inside the hut, then the whole system of the tribal chiefdom is damaged and the tribe eventually disintegrates.’

Attenborough was not far wrong. Even Bryan Forbes, a shrewd commercial film-maker, had reservations. ‘If you let the genie out of the bottle, you can never put the cork back again,’ he said. ‘And a lot of people think, with hindsight, that it was a mistake.’

Small wonder, then, that the Queen, who reluctantly gave her assent to this ‘reinvention that went wrong’, ordered that the film should be withdrawn from circulation.

Even now, more than 40 years later, her attitude towards this misjudged experiment remains implacably negative. In the forthcoming exhibition, The Queen: Art And Image, at the National Portrait ­Gallery, Buckingham Palace has restricted the organisers to only a 90-­second clip from the film.

The other 104 minutes will remain unseen and off-limits, like the 38 hours of unused footage which is now held in the Royal Archives at Windsor, unavailable to the eyes of even serious historians and researchers.

Paul Moorhouse, the curator of the new exhibition, says: ‘Legend has it that the Queen doesn’t want parts of it to be shown. I wish we could show it in its entirety. It tells you a lot about family life. And it ­redefined the nation’s view of the Queen.’

It did indeed, but was it in quite the way she intended or expected? The view now ­generally taken is that this attempt to make the Royals look like ‘just an ordinary family’ was the moment when the rot set in for the House of Windsor.

As the distinguished journalist Sir Peregrine Worsthorne observed at the time: ‘Initially the public will love seeing the Royal Family as not essentially different from anybody else and in the short term letting in the cameras will enhance the monarchy’s popularity. But in the not-so-long run familiarity will breed, if not contempt, well, familiarity.’

It was in 1968 that Lord Mountbatten’s son-in-law, the film producer Lord Brabourne, felt the Royal Family would benefit if it was seen by the public as being more modern and informal. This view was shared by the Queen’s ambitious young Australian press secretary, William Heseltine.

Brabourne suggested to Prince Philip that a documentary should be made about the Royal Family’s private life, ­recommending that Richard Cawston, then head of the BBC’s documentary department, should direct the film.

The Queen had considerable reservations. She consulted her shrewd mother, the one member of the family whose judgment on matters of public relations was considered impeccable. The Queen Mother was vehemently opposed to the plan and told friends she thought it was ‘the most ­terrible idea’.

In the end, it was Prince Philip’s self-serving and self-publicising uncle, Lord Mountbatten — who was, disastrously, to become Prince Charles’s principal mentor — who talked the Queen into authorising the film.

Cawston was given full access to Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle, Sandringham and Balmoral for more than a year, shooting 43 hours of raw ­footage of the Queen’s private and official life.

The final version, cut down to a 105-minute colour ­documentary, entitled Royal Family — but mischievously rechristened Corgi And Beth by satirists — was screened to a worldwide audience of 40 million on June 21, 1969










http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102945/releaseinfo

IMDb


Sleeping with the Enemy (1991)

Release Info

USA 4 February 1991 (Westwood, California) (premiere)



http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0102945/fullcredits

IMDb


Sleeping with the Enemy (1991)

Full Cast & Crew

Julia Roberts ... Laura Burney










JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 6:26 PM

To: Kerry Burgess

Subject: Re: 365 days


Kerry Burgess wrote:
Was it April or May '05 when you bastards were trying to starve me to death? I'm pretty sure it was May. That was a goddamned year ago. How many more years will you people torment me?


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 03 May 2006 excerpt ends]





JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 6:26 PM

To: Kerry Burgess

Subject: Re: 365 days


Kerry Burgess wrote:
[Is this you or are you just a petty thug?:]

http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crim/242fin.htm
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW


Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 03 May 2006 excerpt ends]





JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 6:26 PM

To: Kerry Burgess

Subject: Re: 365 days


Aha, it's about the dream manipulation, the sleep harassment they've been doing without my consent. The production of foreign dreams while I sleep. If I'm dead, the evidence dies too. There are other people that know about it, but alive I am at least 90% of the evidence.

People have tried to kill me in the past, they're probably trying to kill me right now, they will probably try to kill me in the future. Just another day I survived, knowing they'll finally hit me one of these days, but so far today, they haven't got me.


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 03 May 2006 excerpt ends]










From 10/28/1955 ( Microsoft Corbis Bill Gates the transvestite and 100% female gender as born to brother-sister sibling parents and the Soviet Union prostitute and the cowardly International Terrorist violently against the United States of America actively instigates insurrection and subversive activity against the USA and United Nations chartered allies ) To 5/3/2006 is 18450 days

18450 = 9225 + 9225

From 11/2/1965 ( my birth date in Antlers Oklahoma USA and my birthdate as the known official United States Marshal Kerry Wayne Burgess and active duty United States Marine Corps officer ) To 2/4/1991 ( premiere US film "Sleeping with the Enemy" ) is 9225 days



From 9/14/2002 ( at Overlake hospital in Bellevue Washington State the announced birth of Phoebe Gates the daughter of Microsoft Bill Gates the transvestite and Microsoft Bill Gates the 100% female gender as born to brother-sister sibling parents and Microsoft Bill Gates the Soviet Union prostitute ) To 5/3/2006 is 1327 days

From 11/2/1965 ( my birth date in Antlers Oklahoma USA and my birthdate as the known official United States Marshal Kerry Wayne Burgess and active duty United States Marine Corps officer ) To 6/21/1969 ( premiere United Kingdom TV "Royal Family" ) is 1327 days



- posted by H.V.O.M - Kerry Wayne Burgess 5:46 PM Pacific Time Spokane Valley Washington USA Saturday 03 September 2016