excerpts, see also:
https://hvom.blogspot.com/2023/12/today-is-12172023-post-2.html
by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me at 11:30 AM Sunday, December 17, 2023
Today is 12/17/2023, Post #2
Transmit the message, to the receiver,
hope for an answer some day
[excerpt ends]
excerpts, see also:
https://hvom.blogspot.com/2023/12/today-is-12172023-post-3.html
by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me at 6:51 PM Sunday, December 17, 2023
Today is 12/17/2023, Post #3
2023-12-17_2
https://theprince.princeton.edu/princetonperiodicals/?a=d&d=Princetonian19820211-01&e=-------en-20--81-byDA-txt-txIN-------
Princeton University
Daily Princetonian, Volume 106, Number 8, 11 February 1982
Thursday Magazine
Commercials On Campus: Marketing Princeton's Image
[excerpt ends]
http://www.online-literature.com/view.php/kinglear/23
Literature Network » William Shakespeare » King Lear » Act 4. Scene VI
GLOUCESTER
I know that voice.
KING LEAR
Ha! Goneril, with a white beard! They flattered
me like a dog; and told me I had white hairs in my
beard ere the black ones were there. To say 'ay'
and 'no' to every thing that I said!--'Ay' and 'no'
too was no good divinity. When the rain came to
wet me once, and the wind to make me chatter; when
the thunder would not peace at my bidding; there I
found 'em, there I smelt 'em out. Go to, they are
not men o' their words: they told me I was every
thing; 'tis a lie, I am not ague-proof.
dictionary . com
ague
a fit of shivering
excerpts, see also:
https://hvom.blogspot.com/2023/12/today-is-12172023-post-3.html
by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me at 6:51 PM
Number 878: The Farthest Man From Home
I am Kerry Burgess. This is what I think.
Sunday, December 17, 2023
Today is 12/17/2023, Post #3
http://www.online-literature.com/view.php/kinglear/23
Literature Network » William Shakespeare » King Lear » Act 4. Scene VI
GLOUCESTER
The trick of that voice I do well remember:
Is 't not the king?
KING LEAR
Ay, every inch a king:
[excerpt ends]
Posted by Kerry Burgess - H.V.O.M at 6:10 PM Thursday, December 30, 2010
My return in 1998 was different though. I returned but I am a composite version of Tom Reagan and Kerry Burgess. I am not as tall as Tom Reagan and I am as tall as Kerry Burgess but I do not have the physical scars of Kerry Burgess, such as the gunshot wound scar he had on his shoulder.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
Antimatter
From Wikipedia
The term antimatter was first used by Arthur Schuster in two rather whimsical letters to Nature in 1898, in which he coined the term. He hypothesized antiatoms, as well as whole antimatter solar systems, and discussed the possibility of matter and antimatter annihilating each other. Schuster's ideas were not a serious theoretical proposal, merely speculation, and like the previous ideas, differed from the modern concept of antimatter in that it possessed negative gravity.
The modern theory of antimatter began in 1928, with a paper by Paul Dirac. Dirac realised that his relativistic version of the Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicted the possibility of antielectrons. Although Dirac had laid the groundwork for the existence of these "antielectrons" he initially failed to pick up on the implications contained within his own equation. He freely gave the credit for that insight to J. Robert Oppenheimer, whose seminal paper "On the Theory of Electrons and Protons" (Feb 14th 1930) drew on Dirac’s equation and argued for the existence of a positively charged electron (a positron), which as a counterpart to the electron should have the same mass as the electron itself. This meant that it could not be, as Dirac had in fact suggested, a proton. Dirac further postulated the existence of antimatter in a 1931 paper which referred to the positron as an "anti-electron". These were discovered by Carl D. Anderson in 1932 and named positrons from "positive electron". Although Dirac did not himself use the term antimatter, its use follows on naturally enough from antielectrons, antiprotons, etc. A complete periodic table of antimatter was envisaged by Charles Janet in 1929.
The Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation states that antimatter and antiparticles are regular particles traveling backward in time.
- by me, Kerry Wayne Burgess, posted by me: 8:40 PM Pacific-time USA Sunday 12/17/2023
