That really hits me again just now. The argument against my counter-paradox notion.
My so-called 'time-traveler effect' remains well-established as a notion but it is my counter-paradox effect notion that is wavering. I don't think 'wavering' is the correct term.
My counter-paradox notion deals exclusively with the thoughts in my mind and specifically with thoughts in my mind that I do not record in any document that becomes a time-traveler artifact. Ah, so, perhaps, that is the fuzzy detail that escapes me, as those details are fuzzy because that makes perfect sense to me.
I am affected by time-travel. I do not yet know what I will say and or record in documentation in my personal future.