Bradley Manning. What? What's his name? Bradley. What was that again?

JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 2:41 PM

To: 'Chad Trammell'

Subject: RE: The United States of America Department of Justice establishment remains 100% under the control of al-Qaida violently against the United States of America.

So how do I it?

Am I doing it now?

How do I prove that I master technology that is beyond human comprehension?

If I do shatter the illusions of ignorant people and produce a current day "The Day the Earth Stood Still" then that will fall right into the trap of Microsoft al Qaida.

That's what they are doing with those staged show trials such as with the willing participant Bradley Manning, as well as other examples I have documented, including the fact they staged that incident with the Reuters reporter for the reason of that show trial.

So why should I even care?

If people are too stupid to see what is happening then why should I care?

I will have the means to escape and to leave it all behind.

So why should I care?

What can't I just let them set their traps for demonizing my skill at mastering ultraspace technology?

Why should I care?

If people are too stupid to care now they why should I care that they should have known better when it becomes too late?

That is precisely what will happen. They will suddenly understand but only because it has become too late.

I don't know precisely what is going to happen but I look around and I have a pretty good idea.

I see those Microsoft Bill Gates al Qaida terrorists planning global genocide. The Bradley Manning show trial is just one piece on their chess board. Those people are now beyond "should have known better."

So what if I did make a demonstration of my technology? What would that prove? When is the right time? People are frightened to superior power. Superiority polarizes people. So what if I did something to prove that I have control over advanced technology that no one else can even fathom? What would that prove?

I think if I could choose right now to travel backwards in time the first stop I just thought of would be to not only witness the first flight of the Wright Brothers but I would study how people reacted to that. My first guess is that people would be amazed but I wonder if it didn't really seem all that amazing. It was just another contraption after all. A new machine that could be explained so that most people could understand.





http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/09/bradley-manning-civil-war-alqaida


theguardian


Bradley Manning prosecutors cite civil war case in arguing he aided al-Qaida

Defence argues union soldier's conviction of aiding enemy by sharing documents isn't enough of a parallel to WikiLeaks case

Associated Press at Fort Meade, Maryland

guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 9 January 2013 16.34 EST


US military prosecutors are using a 1863 case from the Civil War to advance their argument that an army private charged with sending hundreds of thousands of classified documents to the secret-spilling website WikiLeaks aided al-Qaida.

Lawyers for Pfc Bradley Manning refute the government's claim that Manning's case parallels that of Pvt Henry Vanderwater, a soldier fighting for the Union against the rebels. Vanderwater convicted in 1863 of aiding the enemy by giving an Alexandria, Virginia, newspaper a command roster that was then published.

Vanderwater, a member of the 1st District of Columbia volunteers, was sentenced to three months of hard labor and a dishonorable discharge.

The 25-year-old Manning could get life in prison if he's convicted of indirectly aiding the enemy by leaking US secrets while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010. The government must prove at a trial beginning June 3 that Manning knew al-Qaida members would see what WikiLeaks published; and that he knew or should have known that the material he allegedly leaked could harm the United States or help a foreign power.

Prosecutor Capt Joe Morrow said during a pre-trial hearing Wednesday that the government plans to introduce evidence that al-Qaida members, including Osama bin Laden, saw the war logs and State Department cables Manning allegedly sent to WikiLeaks.

Another prosecutor, Capt Angel Overgaard, cited the Vanderwater case among others Tuesday during the hearing at Fort Meade, near Baltimore. She said military courts have recognized that "publishing information in a newspaper" can "indirectly convey information to the enemy" and constitute aiding the enemy.

Civilian defense attorney David Coombs countered that the civil war-era cases involved coded messages disguised as advertisements. He said all modern cases involve military members who gave the enemy information directly.

"There's been no case in the entire history of military jurisprudence that dealt with somebody providing information to a legitimate journalistic organization and having them publish it and that involved dealing with the enemy," Coombs said.

The issue arose during arguments over a government motion to bar the defense from using evidence of Manning's motive. The military judge, Colonel Denise Lind, said she would rule on that motion at a hearing starting January 16. Lind said she also will rule then on another prosecution motion seeking to block evidence that the US government overclassifies information.

Coombs said barring such evidence would cripple the defense's ability to argue that Manning selectively leaked information he believed couldn't help the enemy. Manning allegedly told an online confidant-turned-government informant, Adrian Lamo, that he leaked the material because "I want people to see the truth" and "information should be free".

Coombs called the charge that Manning indirectly aided the enemy unprecedented. Air force Lt Col David JR Frakt, who teaches military law at the University of Pittsburgh, agreed.

"It's very rare and there hasn't been anything in a long time and probably nothing in the internet area," Frakt said.

He said it may be a stretch for prosecutors to cite a civil war case, but he added: "Just because it's unprecedented doesn't mean they can't make their case."

On Wednesday, Manning offered to plead guilty to reduced charges for two of 22 counts he faces. Both allege violations of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Lind may consider the proffers at a hearing starting February 26, along with similar previous offers involving eight other counts. Coombs has said the pleas would enable Manning to take responsibility for the leaks. The reduced charges for the 10 counts would be military infractions with combined prison sentences of up to 20 years versus 100 years for the original felony charges.

Manning, of Crescent, Oklahoma, is accused of leaking classified Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and more than 250,000 diplomatic cables while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010. He also is charged with leaking 2007 video of a US helicopter crew gunning down 11 men, including a Reuters news photographer and his driver. The Pentagon concluded the troops acted appropriately, having mistaken the camera equipment for weapons.


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 09 January 2013 excerpt ends]










JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 10:58 PM

To: 'Chad Trammell'

Subject: RE: The United States of America Department of Justice establishment remains 100% under the control of al-Qaida violently against the United States of America.

So my guess now is that they, who ever "they" are, will reply to me personally when they intend to attack again.

My guess is they will send me an email the day before, perhaps, they intend to explode an atomic bomb somewhere in the United States.

You see, they *have* to do that.

That is the whole point of their conspiracy.

For some reason, they believe they have to commit war atrocities and they believe they have to tell me about it. But it's something also about how they have to demonstrate that I am not stopping them. That I can't stop them.

That's true. I can't stop them.

Somehow I am not helping them though. I am not helping them to create the historical record they *need.*

They *need* to create some kind of historical record.

That is the premeditation aspect of their criminal activities, such as the show trial for the willing participant Bradley Manning.

Someday in the future they are planning to point back at all that and use it to subjugate the masses.

I guess I am supposed to be Orwell's "Big Brother." Something like that.

They'll bring you into it as well. Doesn't matter what you want.





http://www.seattlepi.com/news/crime/article/WikiLeaks-case-likened-to-Civil-War-espionage-4177964.php


seattle pi


WikiLeaks case likened to Civil War espionage

By DAVID DISHNEAU, Associated Press

Updated 10:13 pm, Tuesday, January 8, 2013

FORT MEADE, Md. (AP) — The defense says military prosecutors are drawing comparisons between an Army private's alleged leak of classified documents to Civil War-era cases involving coded messages in newspapers.

The argument emerged Tuesday during a pretrial hearing at Fort Meade for Pfc. Bradley Manning. The hearing continues Wednesday.

The issue is whether Manning's motive is relevant to a charge he aided the enemy by sending reams of classified documents to the secret-sharing website WikiLeaks. The government contends Manning knew, or should have known, that the information would be seen by al-Qaida.

Defense attorney David Coombs said Tuesday that prosecutors are citing Civil War-era cases concerning soldiers who placed coded messages in newspaper ads.

Coombs says Manning's alleged offenses are more akin to providing government documents to a newspaper.


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 08 January 2013 excerpt ends]










JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:38 PM

To: 'Chad Trammell'

Subject: RE: The United States of America Department of Justice establishment remains 100% under the control of al-Qaida violently against the United States of America.


In a spectacular conspiracy to defraud the United States of America the day Manning was arrested directly associates


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 03 January 2013 excerpt ends]










JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 8:38 PM

To: 'Chad Trammell'

Subject: RE: The United States of America Department of Justice establishment remains 100% under the control of al-Qaida violently against the United States of America.


Every person associated with the Bradley Manning conspiracy is guilty of providing material support to terrorist activity against the United States of America.


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 03 January 2013 excerpt ends]










JOURNAL ARCHIVE: From: Kerry Burgess

Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 7:38 PM

To: 'Chad Trammell'

Subject: The United States of America Department of Justice establishment remains 100% under the control of al-Qaida violently against the United States of America.

http://www.fara.gov/fara-faq.html


THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE


WHAT IS FARA?

FARA is short for the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, 22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF FARA?

The purpose of FARA is to insure that the U.S. Government and the people of the United States are informed of the source of information (propaganda) and the identity of persons attempting to influence U.S. public opinion, policy, and laws. In 1938, FARA was Congress' response to the large number of German propaganda agents in the pre-WWII U.S..










http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleichschaltung


Gleichschaltung

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gleichschaltung (meaning "coordination", "making the same", "bringing into line", is a Nazi term for the process by which the Nazi regime successively established a system of totalitarian control and tight coordination over all aspects of society. The historian Richard J. Evans translated the term as "forcible-coordination" in his most recent work on Nazi Germany.

Among the goals of this policy were to bring about adherence to a specific doctrine and way of thinking and to control as many aspects of life as possible.










http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_propaganda


Nazi propaganda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Propaganda, the coordinated attempt to influence public opinion through the use of media, was skillfully used by the NSDAP in the years leading up to and during Adolf Hitler's leadership of Germany (1933–1945). National Socialist propaganda provided a crucial instrument for acquiring and maintaining power, and for the implementation of their policies, including the pursuit of total war and the extermination of millions of people in the Holocaust.


In power (1933–39)

Before World War II, Nazi propaganda strategy, officially promulgated by the Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, stressed several themes. Their goals were to establish external enemies (countries that allegedly inflicted the Treaty of Versailles on Germany) and internal enemies, such as Jews, Romani, homosexuals, and Bolsheviks. Hitler and Nazi propagandists played on the anti-Semitism and resentment present in Germany. The Jews were blamed for things such as robbing the German people of their hard work while themselves avoiding physical labour. Der Stürmer, a Nazi propaganda newspaper, told Germans that Jews kidnapped small children before Passover because “Jews need the blood of a Christian child, maybe, to mix in with their Matzah.” Posters, films, cartoons, and fliers were seen throughout Germany which attacked the Jewish community, such as the 1940 film The Eternal Jew.

Reaching out to ethnic Germans in other countries such as Czechoslovakia, France, Poland, the Soviet Union and the Baltic states was another aim of Nazi party propaganda. In Mein Kampf, Hitler makes a direct remark to those outside of Germany. He states that pain and misery is forced upon ethnic Germans outside of Germany, and that they dream of common fatherland. He finished by stating they needed to fight for one’s nationality. Throughout Mein Kampf, he pushed Germans worldwide to make the struggle for political power and independence their main focus.

Nazi propaganda efforts then focused on creating external enemies.










http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/03/adrian-lamo-bradley-manning-q-and-a


theguardian


Adrian Lamo on Bradley Manning: 'I knew my actions might cost him his life'

More than two years after Manning's arrest, the man who gave him up talks to Ed Pilkington about how he made the decision

Bradley Manning and me: why I cannot regret turning in the WikiLeaks suspect

Ed Pilkington

guardian.co.uk, Thursday 3 January 2013 13.12 EST


Ed Pilkington: Let's start with the reason we're having this IM chat: Bradley Manning. We heard Manning himself recently describe his treatment during the nine months he was held in Quantico marine base on suspicion of having leaked hundreds of thousands of confidential US documents and videos to WikiLeaks. Have you been following the proceedings, and if so how closely?

Adrian Lamo: My only exposure to the proceedings right now is the things that people ask me whether I've heard. That sometimes disturbs folks' sense of perspective, as though it's wrong of me to have more to my life than Bradley Manning. It's not because I take it lightly, but because I take it as seriously as I do. Making the choice to interdict a man's freedom knowing it could mean his life, is something that's easy to judge but can only really be understood by living it. You either fold it into your character, come to terms and go on with your life, or you get stuck in that moment forever. For a while I thought I would be. I took it badly. But I came to terms and continued my life some time ago. It has, after all, been two years.

EP: We heard harrowing testimony from Manning. Locked in his 8x6ft cell for 23 hours and 40 minutes a day, stripped naked at night, made to stand to attention at morning call in the nude. And on and on … I appreciate that you might not want your life to be stuck on Manning, but hearing such details must have an impact on you. Did you expect him to face such harsh treatment when, as you put it, you chose to interdict his freedom by passing his details to the FBI?

AL: As a clarification, I co-operated with the Department of Defense in this matter, not the FBI. This is the army's prosecution, and while there's some overlap, the FBI is looking at another spectrum of issues.










http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unregistered


unregistered

not registered










http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coyote


Coyote

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The coyote (Canis latrans), also known as the American jackal


Communication

The calls a coyote makes are high-pitched and variously described as howls, yips, yelps, and barks. These calls may be a long rising and falling note (a howl) or a series of short notes (yips). These calls are most often heard at dusk or night, but may sometimes be heard in the day, even in the middle of the day. Although these calls are made throughout the year, they are most common during the spring mating season and in the fall when the pups leave their families to establish new territories. When a coyote calls its pack together, it howls at one high note. When the pack is together, it howls higher and higher, and then it will yip and yelp and also do a yi-yi sound, very shrill, with the howl.


[JOURNAL ARCHIVE 03 January 2013 excerpt ends]



- posted by H.V.O.M - Kerry Wayne Burgess 10:50 AM Pacific Time Seattle USA Wednesday 27 February 2013